蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 1920|回复: 14
收起左侧

[FDA药事] FDA对水系统开出的警告信

[复制链接]
药徒
发表于 2013-4-4 23:36:03 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
  • Failure to validate and monitor the water purification system to ensure that water is of appropriate quality.
Your firm uses water in the final purification step of Fluorescein USP, an API intended for use in sterile drug products. However, your firm failed to demonstrate that your purified water system can consistently produce water that is suitable for use in the manufacture of this API.   

This is a repeat observation from the July 21-August 8, 2010 inspection. In your response to observations made at the 2010 inspection, your firm promised actions it would take to assure reliable water quality. However, those changes were inadequate, as you continued to get periodic out-of-specification (OOS) endotoxin and total organic carbon (TOC) test results.

In your response to the observations noted during the 2012 inspection, you indicated your firm’s intention to conduct a comprehensive gap analysis of the purified water system. However, you have failed to indicate when you will initiate this gap analysis and when it will be completed. Your firm also failed to detail how you will determine the source(s) of high endotoxin and TOC in your purified water and how your firm will remedy identified problem(s). We note that, for example, your firm installed an endotoxin removal unit on your purified water system in January 2011 in response to the OOS results for endotoxin in the water used for API. However, your firm has not demonstrated that the water produced by the purified water system is now suitable for use in production. The operational parameters and effectiveness of the new endotoxin removal unit have not been qualified. Your firm does not monitor the microbial and chemical attributes of the feed water, and have no assurances that the purified water system is capable of consistently producing water that meets specifications for a given quality of feed water. Your gap analysis should also include evaluation of factors such as feed water quality, whether each component of the purified water system is meeting its performance specifications, and whether the system’s output is reproducible. Your firm has not determined the source of the endotoxin failures in the past, and it is essential that you demonstrate that changes in design and operational procedures have resulted in a reliable water system.
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-5 00:03:05 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 GmpForEver 于 2013-4-5 00:04 编辑

简单翻译了一下:
1、未验证和监测水的纯化系统来确保水符合适当的质量要求
你公司在生产 USP标准的Fluorescein产品的最终纯化步骤使用了水,该原料药用来做无菌制剂。然而,你公司不能证明该纯化水系统能够始终如一生产出满足此原料药生产的合适的水。
这是自2010年7月21日-8月8日检查之后重复出现的问题。在你2010年对此问题的回复中,承诺采取措施保证可靠的水的质量。然而相关的变更是非充分的,因为定期产生了细菌内毒素和TOC的OOS测试结果。
在你的2010年检查问题回复中,你指出你们公司要对纯化水系统执行一个全面的缺陷分析,然而,不能看出你们何时启动、何时完成这个缺陷分析,你公司也没有详细确定纯化水中高内毒素、TOC的原因,也未确定你公司如何解决这些问题。 我们注意到,你公司在出现内毒素OOS结果后在纯化水系统中安装了细菌内毒素去除单元,然而你公司未证明现在生产出的水能够符合生产要求。 细菌内毒素去除单元的运行参数和有效性未经过确认. 你公司未监测原水的微生物和化学指标,也不能保证该纯化水系统用这种原水能够能够始终如一生产出符合要求的纯化水来。你的缺陷分析应当包括类似原水质量等因素的评估,纯化水系统的每个单元是否能够符合它的性能要求,系统的输出是否有重现性. 在过去,你公司未确定细菌内毒素失败的原因,最基本的应当证明设计和运行程序的变化能够导致一个可靠的水系统。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-5 00:31:19 | 显示全部楼层
摘自:http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Enforce ... /2013/ucm340918.htm

原文:
Abbey Color, Inc. 2/19/13
   
Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
  PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT
900 U.S. Customhouse
2nd end Chestnut Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Telephone: 215-597-4390  



WARNING LETTER
13-PHI-11



CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


February 19, 2013                  

Mr. Richard S. Nielsen
Abbey Color, Inc.
400 E. Tioga Street
Philadelphia, PA 19134

Dear Mr. Nielsen:

During our March 13, 2012 through March 23, 2012, inspection of your active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing facility, Abbey Color, Inc., located at 400 E. Tioga St, Philadelphia, PA, an investigator from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified deviations from current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) for the manufacture of APIs. These deviations cause your APIs to be adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), (21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B)), in that the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, their manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to, or are not operated or administered in conformity with, CGMP.

We have conducted a detailed review of your firm’s response, dated April 12, 2012, and note that it lacks sufficient corrective actions.

Our investigator observed specific violations during the inspection, including, but not limited to, the following:

Failure to validate and monitor the water purification system to ensure that water is of appropriate quality.

Your firm uses water in the final purification step of Fluorescein USP, an API intended for use in sterile drug products. However, your firm failed to demonstrate that your purified water system can consistently produce water that is suitable for use in the manufacture of this API.   

This is a repeat observation from the July 21-August 8, 2010 inspection. In your response to observations made at the 2010 inspection, your firm promised actions it would take to assure reliable water quality. However, those changes were inadequate, as you continued to get periodic out-of-specification (OOS) endotoxin and total organic carbon (TOC) test results.

In your response to the observations noted during the 2012 inspection, you indicated your firm’s intention to conduct a comprehensive gap analysis of the purified water system. However, you have failed to indicate when you will initiate this gap analysis and when it will be completed. Your firm also failed to detail how you will determine the source(s) of high endotoxin and TOC in your purified water and how your firm will remedy identified problem(s). We note that, for example, your firm installed an endotoxin removal unit on your purified water system in January 2011 in response to the OOS results for endotoxin in the water used for API. However, your firm has not demonstrated that the water produced by the purified water system is now suitable for use in production. The operational parameters and effectiveness of the new endotoxin removal unit have not been qualified. Your firm does not monitor the microbial and chemical attributes of the feed water, and have no assurances that the purified water system is capable of consistently producing water that meets specifications for a given quality of feed water. Your gap analysis should also include evaluation of factors such as feed water quality, whether each component of the purified water system is meeting its performance specifications, and whether the system’s output is reproducible. Your firm has not determined the source of the endotoxin failures in the past, and it is essential that you demonstrate that changes in design and operational procedures have resulted in a reliable water system.

Failure to adequately investigate and document OOS test results.

For example, your rinse water from cleaning equipment used to manufacture (b)(4) lots of Fluorescein, USP from October 2010, to December 2011, had (b)(4) results that were OOS for endotoxin and/or total organic carbon (TOC). Your firm failed to document that these were OOS results, conduct an investigation to determine the root cause of these recurring failures, or implement corrective actions.

Executive management of your firm is responsible for assuring quality system effectiveness. A basic part of this responsibility is prompt identification and remediation of problems that indicate manufacturing control problems, including an evaluation of the impact of these deviations on the quality of your APIs.

We acknowledge that you indicate in your response the intention to conduct a comprehensive gap analysis of your firm’s investigation and remediation processes pertaining to non-conformances, deviations, OOS events, and quality-related complaints. However, you did not indicate when you will initiate this gap analysis or any timeline for its completion. Your response also does not indicate what specific interim steps (e.g., initial procedural revisions, train employees) you intend to take to ensure that thorough investigations are conducted in a timely manner.

Failure to establish an adequate stability program to monitor the stability characteristics of APIs and to use the results to confirm appropriate storage conditions and retest or expiry dates.

For example, your firm has only put one Fluorescein USP API lot on stability, lot #(b)(4), distributed December 15, 2010. Your firm has limited data to demonstrate that the API is stable for the recommended retest date of (b)(4) years. Your firm also failed to test stability samples for identification at the end of (b)(4) of the four storage quarters (b)(4) as required by your firm’s procedure.

This is also a repeat observation from the 2010 inspection. As part of your firm’s corrective actions following that inspection, you implemented a standard operating procedure, (b)(4), entitled “(b)(4).” However, your procedure require only monitoring, not control, of temperature and humidity storage conditions for stability samples, and it does not define what testing is to be performed on stability samples or reference documents that do define such testing. At the 2012 inspection, our investigator found that temperatures in the USP cage in which you store stability samples can reach (b)(4) in the winter and (b)(4) in the summer.

Your current response is inadequate in that you have not defined the stability testing you will perform. You state that your firm will “…subject each sample to our standard battery of tests...” and “…will coordinate a microbe study on all sample lots.” However, you did not describe what testing will be conducted, other than the identity and endotoxin tests that will be performed by a third party. Please provide documentation of this correction in your response, and specify how your firm’s stability program will monitor the characteristics of the API. Your response should also detail how you will confirm or establish your retest date and storage conditions. In addition, you should describe how this information will be provided to customers and if your finished Fluorescein USP API labeling will be changed to include this information.

The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations that exist at your facility.  You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence and the occurrence of other violations.

If, as a result of receiving this warning letter or for other reasons, you are considering a decision that could reduce the amount of active pharmaceutical ingredients produced by your manufacturing facility, FDA requests that you contact CDER's Drug Shortages Program immediately, as you begin your internal discussions, at drugshortages@fda.hhs.gov so that we can work with you on the most effective way to bring your operations into compliance with the law. Contacting the Drug Shortages Program also allows you to meet any obligations you may have to report discontinuances in the manufacture of your drug under 21 U.S.C. 356C(a)(1), and allows FDA to consider, as soon as possible, what actions, if any, may be needed to avoid shortages and protect the health of patients who depend on your products. In appropriate cases, you may be able to take corrective action without interrupting supply, or to shorten any interruption, thereby avoiding or limiting drug shortages.

You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter.  Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice including, without limitation, seizure and injunction. Other federal agencies may take this warning letter into account when considering the award of contracts. Additionally, FDA may withhold approval of requests for export certificates, or approval of pending drug applications listing your facility, until the above violations are corrected.  FDA may re-inspect to verify corrective actions have been completed.

Within fifteen working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct and prevent the recurrence of violations, and provide copies of supporting documentation. If you cannot complete corrective actions within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the date by which you will have completed the corrections. Additionally, if you no longer manufacture or distribute Fluorescein USP, provide the date and reason you ceased production.

Your reply should be sent to the following address: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Customhouse, Room 900, 2nd and Chestnut Sts., Philadelphia, PA 19106, Attn: Kristina Donohue, Compliance Officer. If you have questions regarding any issues in this letter, please contact Kristina Donohue at (215) 717-3078 or Kristina.Donohue@fda.hhs.gov.

                                                                        
Sincerely,
/S/                                                                        
Kirk D. Sooter
District Director
Philadelphia District


(b)(4)

-
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 07:24:13 | 显示全部楼层
值得借鉴的问题....
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 08:25:45 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢分享 学习了 对国内企业也是一个警示
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 09:15:45 | 显示全部楼层
我的理解是:主要问题在于 该纯化水系统未验证产生的水的内毒素和TOC符合出口国的质量指标,其二是OOS未能找出根本原因并解决。

点评

欢迎大家的积极讨论: 也分享一下自己的理解:1.首先是该公司生产的这个原料药的特殊性,因为其实用来生产无菌制剂,所以对生产过程中使用到的纯化水有特殊的要求,除了达到纯化水USP的要求,还需要控制细菌内毒素,  详情 回复 发表于 2013-4-5 11:21

评分

参与人数 1金币 +2 收起 理由
GmpForEver + 2 欢迎讨论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2013-4-5 09:35:57 | 显示全部楼层
学习了,谢谢分享
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2013-4-5 10:30:40 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 10:30:56 | 显示全部楼层
我的理解是,水系统,一年四季由于原水质量发生变化,要对其进行质量回顾,并对其进行整改!

点评

欢迎大家的积极讨论: 也分享一下自己的理解:1.首先是该公司生产的这个原料药的特殊性,因为其实用来生产无菌制剂,所以对生产过程中使用到的纯化水有特殊的要求,除了达到纯化水USP的要求,还需要控制细菌内毒素,  详情 回复 发表于 2013-4-5 11:22

评分

参与人数 1金币 +2 收起 理由
GmpForEver + 2 欢迎讨论

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-5 11:21:51 | 显示全部楼层
cgycxd 发表于 2013-4-5 09:15
我的理解是:主要问题在于 该纯化水系统未验证产生的水的内毒素和TOC符合出口国的质量指标,其二是OOS未能找 ...

欢迎大家的积极讨论:
也分享一下自己的理解:1.首先是该公司生产的这个原料药的特殊性,因为其实用来生产无菌制剂,所以对生产过程中使用到的纯化水有特殊的要求,除了达到纯化水USP的要求,还需要控制细菌内毒素,TOC也应严格控制。2.该公司曾经在2010年接受过FDA检查时,483中已经被提出这个缺陷,也制定了整改措施。但是2012年再次检查时发现该问题未得到很好的解决,新增加的细菌内毒素去除单元未进行确认而导致整改系统并不是很稳定,不能保证始终如一的生产出符合要求的质量的纯化水来。3.细菌内毒素、TOC可能由于原水导致,季节性问题可能存在。4.OOS未充分得到调查
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-5 11:22:06 | 显示全部楼层
英雄崛起 发表于 2013-4-5 10:30
我的理解是,水系统,一年四季由于原水质量发生变化,要对其进行质量回顾,并对其进行整改!

欢迎大家的积极讨论:
也分享一下自己的理解:1.首先是该公司生产的这个原料药的特殊性,因为其实用来生产无菌制剂,所以对生产过程中使用到的纯化水有特殊的要求,除了达到纯化水USP的要求,还需要控制细菌内毒素,TOC也应严格控制。2.该公司曾经在2010年接受过FDA检查时,483中已经被提出这个缺陷,也制定了整改措施。但是2012年再次检查时发现该问题未得到很好的解决,新增加的细菌内毒素去除单元未进行确认而导致整改系统并不是很稳定,不能保证始终如一的生产出符合要求的质量的纯化水来。3.细菌内毒素、TOC可能由于原水导致,季节性问题可能存在。4.OOS未充分得到调查

点评

我们是生产无菌原料药和无菌制剂。我们纯化水,也检测内毒素,按照USP全捡!  详情 回复 发表于 2013-4-5 15:49
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-5 11:48:39 | 显示全部楼层
albance 发表于 2013-4-5 11:38
看了之后肯定是那个纯化水不符合无菌制剂的要求,不想上注射用水机组

无菌制剂用到的原料药是非无菌的,但是也有特殊性,不一定非得上WFI
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 14:10:21 | 显示全部楼层
学习了,楼上有牛人呀,翻译过来了
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 15:49:10 | 显示全部楼层
GmpForEver 发表于 2013-4-5 11:22
欢迎大家的积极讨论:
也分享一下自己的理解:1.首先是该公司生产的这个原料药的特殊性,因为其实用来生 ...

我们是生产无菌原料药和无菌制剂。我们纯化水,也检测内毒素,按照USP全捡!

点评

无菌原料药的生产从粉碎开始,到最终分装、密封。都应该在B级背景下的A级吧,这要求跟非无菌的原料药的生产级别差异可不是一点点。另清洁纯化水系统中处理内毒素的单元是啥?  发表于 2013-4-9 10:17
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-4-5 20:40:15 | 显示全部楼层
学习了
谢谢分享
要做日常的检测
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-6-7 04:08

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表