蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 2583|回复: 5
收起左侧

[吐槽及其他] 【CFDA审核查验中心】来料验货问题

[复制链接]
大师
发表于 2017-5-26 18:54:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
咨询内容:老师你好!请问原料、辅料来料时都必须开箱每瓶检查吗?当来料几百箱时,可操作性不强。外箱上的除物料信息外的标签如物流标签都要撕毁吗?
回复:这个问题首先应建立一个风险分析的机制,并在供应商审计的基础上进行。如无菌原料药的风险高,应每件包装进行检查,但考虑到污染的风险较高,不可轻易打开内包装。如供应商审计时该企业无外观相似的产品,可不必每件都打开取样鉴别;如有单发的用于检测的小包装,可对其进行鉴别检查;如原辅料系供应中间商提供,尤其是曾被分包装过的,则属于必须每件检查的范围;企业如有近红外扫描设备,也可以不开箱检查,直接每件扫描鉴别即可。这种鉴别不可混样后操作。物流标签如已覆盖物料信息,或严重影响外观,可撕毁。


http://www.cfdi.org.cn/cfdi/index?module=A004&part=localfrm&tcode=STA026&id=240827
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-5-26 21:11:04 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2017-5-27 08:29:13 | 显示全部楼层
学习了。谢谢分享
回复

使用道具 举报

药师
发表于 2017-5-27 11:24:24 | 显示全部楼层
这样的回复比较到位
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2017-8-4 18:01:35 | 显示全部楼层
我觉得官方是将“来料验收”和“来料取样检查”的混淆了吧。
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2017-8-4 18:11:58 | 显示全部楼层
这个可以作个参考§211.82   Receipt and storage of untested components, drug product containers, and closures.

(a) Upon receipt and before acceptance, each container or grouping of containers of components, drug product containers, and closures shall be examined visually for appropriate labeling as to contents, container damage or broken seals, and contamination.

[43 FR 45077, Sept. 29, 1978, as amended at 73 FR 51932, Sept. 8, 2008]
213. A number of comments on 211.82(a) said individual containers of components, containers, and closures need not be visually examined before acceptance as long as they are checked before use.  The rationale for the comments is that a visual check of each container is impractical and unrealistic for large shipments of bagged materials that are palletized as a unit and/or shrink-wrapped.  The respondents suggested that tearing apart materials packaged in that manner would be costly and could be better done before use rather than in a receiving area.     It was the Commissioner's intent in this paragraph to provide for a simple check at the time of receipt to detect obvious problems such as the wrong article, damaged containers, or visible contamination which would preclude any further handling of the materials.  He recognizes, however, that individual container examination of large lots of bagged or boxed materials is impractical when they are received.  Therefore, this requirement is revised to provide for examination of each container or grouping of containers.     214. A number of comments expressed concern over the possibility of contamination if containers of components and other materials are opened for examination in the receiving areas of factories.  To avoid cross-contamination it was suggested that examinations be limited to the exterior of the containers or to shipping containers.     The Commissioner notes that this paragraph does not specify that seals must be broken for purposes of examination.  It is the intent of this paragraph that a visual examination be performed. In most cases it would be adequate to limit the examination to shipping containers.  If the firm feels an inspection should be made in depth, proper precautions must be taken to prevent cross-contamination.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  京ICP证150354号  互联网药品信息服务证书编号: (京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2024-9-21 23:35

Powered by Discuz! X3.4运维单位:苏州豚鼠科技有限公司

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表