蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 3385|回复: 10
收起左侧

[吐槽及其他] 瑞士Laboratoire Sintyl S.A. FDA警告信

[复制链接]
药生
发表于 2016-10-14 15:39:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
2016年6月20日至23日,FDA对瑞士Laboratoire Sintyl S.A.进行了检查,检查缺陷情况如下:
1. 你们没有建立适用于质量控制部门的书面的职责和程序,包括OOS结果和客户投诉的审核。在检查期间,你们显示了你们没有独立的质量部门。
2. 你们未能检测你们最终药品的活性成分的鉴别和含量。
3.你们未能确保鉴别来自不同供应商的成分,包括XX活性成分。
4.你们未能在适当的时间间隔内清洁和维护你们的XX设备以避免故障或污染你们的产品。在检查期间,我们发现在你们XX设备上有和锈一样的红褐色的变色。
5.你们没有为生产和工艺控制建立书面的程序,包括验证方案和报告,设计用来确保你们药品有它们声称或代表拥有的鉴别、含量、质量和纯度。在检查期间,你们承认你们公司没有工艺验证的程序。
6.你们没有数据证明你们产品的化学和物料属性在他们货架生命周期内能够保持可接受。

警告信原文如下:
                                                               

Warning Letter 320-16-37
Via UPS  
Return Receipt Requested
September 29, 2016
           
Mr. Rémy Pfenniger  
CEO/Owner
Laboratoire Sintyl S.A.
Route Des Jeunes 23
Carouge Ge, Geneva, 1227
Switzerland
Dear Mr. Rémy Pfenniger:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected your drug manufacturing facility, Laboratoire Sintyl S.A. at Route Des Jeunes 23, Carouge Ge, Geneva, from June 20 to 23, 2016.
This warning letter summarizes significant violations of current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations for finished pharmaceuticals. See 21 CFR, parts 210 and 211.
Because your methods, facilities, or controls for manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to CGMP, your drug product is adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B).
We reviewed your July 5, 2016, response in detail. In that response, you stated that you produced (b)(4) over-the-counter drug and have ceased its manufacture. You did not commit to (b)(4) and to keeping FDA informed of the (b)(4) progress. You have yet to provide FDA with any evidence to document that a (b)(4) has occurred.
During our inspection, our investigator observed specific violations including, but not limited to, the following.
1.    You failed to establish written responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit, including the review of out-of-specification results and customer complaints. (21 CFR 211.22(d)). During the inspection, you indicated that you have no independent quality unit.

2.    You failed to test finished batches of your drug products for the identity and strength of active ingredients. (21 CFR 211.165(a))

3.    You failed to ensure the identity of components sourced from various suppliers, including your (b)(4) active ingredients. (21 CFR 211.84(d)(1) and (2))

4.    You failed to clean and maintain your (b)(4) at appropriate intervals to prevent malfunctions or contamination of your drug products. (21 CFR 211.67(d)). During the inspection, we observed reddish brown discoloration consistent with rust on your (b)(4).

5.    You failed to establish written procedures for production and process controls, including validation protocols and reports, designed to assure that your drug products have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess. (21 CFR 211.100(a)). During the inspection, you acknowledged that your firm has no procedures for process validation.

6.    You have no data to demonstrate that the chemical and physical properties of your products remain acceptable throughout their shelf lives. (21 CFR 211.166(a))

You distributed at least (b)(4) batches of (b)(4) Emulsion (b)(4) to the United States, despite the above violations, as well as others cited on the June 23, 2016 Form FDA-483.

CGMP consultant recommended
If your firm resumes manufacturing drugs for the United States market, we strongly recommend engaging a consultant, qualified as set forth in 21 CFR 211.34, to assist your firm in meeting CGMP requirements. Your use of a consultant does not relieve your firm’s obligation to comply with CGMP. Your firm’s executive management remains responsible for fully resolving all deficiencies and ensuring ongoing CGMP compliance.
Conclusion
Violations cited in this letter are not intended as an all-inclusive list. You are responsible for investigating these violations, for determining the causes, for preventing their recurrence, and for preventing other violations.
Until you correct all violations completely and we confirm your compliance with CGMP, FDA may withhold approval of any new applications or supplements listing your firm as a drug manufacturer.
Failure to correct these violations may also result in FDA refusing admission of articles manufactured at Route Des Jeunes 23, Carouge Ge, Geneva, into the United States under section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 381(a)(3). Under the same authority, articles may be subject to refusal of admission, in that the methods and controls used in their manufacture do not appear to conform to CGMP within the meaning of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B).
After you receive this letter, respond to this office in writing within 15 working days. Specify what you have done since our inspection to correct your violations and to prevent their recurrence. If you cannot complete corrective actions within 15 working days, state your reasons for delay and your schedule for completion.
Send your electronic reply to [url=]CDER-OC-OMQ-Communications@fda.hhs.gov[/url] or mail your reply to:
Philip Kreiter, Public Health Analyst
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
White Oak Building 51, Room 4359
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
USA
Please identify your response with FEI 1000488360.
Sincerely,
/S/
Francis Godwin
Acting Director
Office of Manufacturing Quality
Office of Compliance
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research


回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-10-14 15:53:28 | 显示全部楼层
说白了这个公司就没有质量管理体系,FDA还去审计?

点评

是的 几乎条条都是死罪  发表于 2016-10-14 15:58
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2016-10-14 15:56:07 | 显示全部楼层
楼上说的是,这个是个公司吗,一点GMP都不懂的样子
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-10-14 16:12:56 | 显示全部楼层
看样子是个实验室
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-10-14 16:40:54 | 显示全部楼层
怎么欧洲也有这样的企业?
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-10-14 16:46:41 | 显示全部楼层
天下的乌鸦一般黑啊
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-10-14 16:58:00 | 显示全部楼层
小作坊????
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-10-14 19:41:28 | 显示全部楼层
学习,路过
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-8 19:33:50 | 显示全部楼层
欧洲还有这样的药企?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-1-16 11:32:08 | 显示全部楼层
这是家化妆品公司啊……FDA对化妆品的GMP要求也丝毫不含糊啊……
我对这家公司的产品有所了解,历史还挺悠久的,抗衰和生发产品做的很好,走美容沙龙渠道。其实,欧洲的化妆品公司没有特别严格的GMP要求,除非本公司自己申请各种认证,去年香港美博会上听他们的香港代理说过,FDA的检查主要是为了股东转换的商业行为,新的股东正在投入大量资金做GMP整改。
看来还是得苦练内功啊,以后监管会越来越细致……说不定哪天国内也开始对化妆品生产提出要求呢……到时又会是一番怎样的景象……
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-2-18 07:18

Powered by Discuz! X3.4运维单位:苏州豚鼠科技有限公司

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表